Life after Tony Blair

What will our man, Tone, get up to next? The Herald's inside scoop

According to the BBC news website, Tony Blair has begun speculating about the future of Britain under Gordon Brown's leadership. The titan of a man who has held the reigns of this grand island for so long has said he will stand down before the next election. He predicted that Gordon Brown will not try to reverse his legacy of public service reform if he becomes prime minister and insisted that the big money man, GB, backed efforts to increase choice in public services.

The Herald believes that we should have consecutive days of national mourning from now until three years after the next election to mark the passing of this statesman, national hero and downright attractive man. We are also somewhat disturbed by the likely replacement of this adonis figure with someone who, frankly, is far less attractive. GB is a great wing man for the Tone. He adds like a machine and signs off new government bond issues like a seasoned professional but, as a leader? We can't see it.

Never mind though. We can't always have the best world leader. Not when we keep winning the cricket and rugby as well. GB for a bit, someone who isn't Michael Howard for a bit (when will we know?), maybe even that lunatic Scotsman for a bit. It doesn't really matter as long as Tony's work is left unblemished.

The question that everyone is asking is where will this combination of the best of Ghandi, Winston Churchill and Nelson Mandela apply his enormous talent and strength of intellect next? Frequent readers will have probably guessed the answer. Cricklewood, of course.

The Herald has learned that Tony is planning to accept an appointment as Cricklewood commander in chief. This is a position with central government akin to the various policy czars but a bit more important and with complete autonomy and total executive power. First on the list is addressing the chronic neglect of Cricklewood by the regional axis of evil - the Councils of Brent, Barnet and Camden. For years, Cricklewood has suffered by being at the nexus of these three councils. Councillors from lesser locations look to Cricklewood with envy and say to themselves that they will teach the smug little community of Cricklewood to laugh on the other side of its face. No longer. Tony is riding in on a white horse and emblazoned on the side of that steed will be the word "Cricklewood".

We think Tony should also consider:

• introducing a new Cricklewood tube station on a new line which goes direct to Central London without stopping at lesser locations such as West Hampstead
• undergrounding the Broadway, replacing the surface with a pedestrianised parkway
• flood mitigation as previously recommended on this website
• repairing the belltower at St Gabriels and evicting the happy-clappies
• immediate immigration restrictions to maintain the charm of the area - particularly aiming at stopping New Zealanders
• walling out Willesden Green

When you are Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, what is the next step up? Cricklewood of course.

Flood Protection

Protecting our heritage and culture

With the tragic events of New Orleans in recent days, I am buoyed only by the fact that I know that my fellow residents in Cricklewood have not a depraved bone in their bodies. Crime is something only experienced in Cricklewood on those occasions when nearby Willesden Green residents forget themselves and cross over from Walm Lane into Chichele Road. We can therefore be relatively comfortable that widespread devastation in Cricklewood would result in an orderly withdrawal by residents, followed by a later restitution of those residents to houses looted only by the storm which led to the events.

There remain some questions though. What measures have the London Boroughs of Barnet, Brent and Camden (our triumvirate of overlords) done to prevent flooding in Cricklewood? Have these councils sat, in joint forum, and asked themselves these questions:

• Where would the home renovation plans of London be if the Cricklewood B&Q were to be closed down because of storms?
• What would be the psychological effect on thousands of old-age pensioners if the Beacon Bingo ceased to trade?
• Where would generations of children learn to snog if the Galtymore were blown over?
• What would happen if the Crown were flooded with something other than beer?
• If we have a hangover and Pedro's is not trading, would we survive?

Even a cursory examination of these questions demonstrates the urgency of need to protect Cricklewood from the events of New Orleans. We are not advocating for a wall, Gaza-style, to be erected. While many of us have entertained the idea of keeping out the rest of the world from our little corner of heaven, the fact remains that three things prevent this: our openness to outside influences, our natural curiosity (which leads us to travel) and our civilising influence on the remainder of London. We therefore embrace our openness.

We are therefore forced to the next best defence against floods - enormous pumps. These would be located at strategic sites on the Cricklewood borders including the boundary of Chichele Road and Walm Lane, the upper and lower ends of the Broadway, and around the A41. The objective would be to suck the water from Cricklewood and spray it in a wide arc in the direction of Willesden Green, Kilburn, Brent Cross, West Hampstead and so forth, as the case dictates. Tihs would marginally worsen any flooding in those areas but would not lead to any significant issues since (a) those areas don't count and (b) some of them are on high ground and therefore wouldn't flood too badly in any event. The second point underlines the need for very big pumps and a very large wide arc for spraying.

There is also the issue of security, we do not wish to prevent visitors in the normal course of events but in this situation, it may be considered appropriate to arm some residents for territorial defence. All Cricklewood residents (including Ken Livingstone) might be forced to wear an identifying mark such as a yellow star, allowing territorial defenders (or perhaps we might call them community wardens) to fire at will on those not so marked. In this way, the gangs from Willesden Green are likely to keep their distance at critical points.

As I write this, I know that the majority of Londoners reading it will be nodding their heads and murmuring to themselves something along the lines of "Sound idea! Reasonable thinking" but you will be astonished to learn that the triumvirate of overlords has yet to convene a joint council meeting even to consider the subject and they are yet to formally outline plans at all similar to these.

As with so many other things with which our newspaper and our people concern themsleves, our local representatives have let us down. Shame.